Disputatio:Budapestinum
Actually there is a very common Latin form of the modern name, to whit Budapestinum. --Iustinus 17:12, 28 Decembris 2006 (UTC)
- Et Aquincum modernum est nomen regii Budapestini. Probabiliter nomen Budapestinum sit melior quidem. – cerasusvoca! 12:24, 19 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
- Aquincum corresponds to Óbuda not Budapest.
- Then what's needed is an article about Budapest and an article about Aquincum/Óbuda. Till we have both, the interwiki change is not helpful, so I have reverted it. For the present, this is our article about Budapest. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:04, 11 Augusti 2007 (UTC)
- Then the name of the article should be changed to Budapestinum, since there are a few wikis with the article Aquincum and the robots might make a mess in the interwikis. -- [Anon]
- I agree. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:22, 13 Augusti 2007 (UTC)
- Then the name of the article should be changed to Budapestinum, since there are a few wikis with the article Aquincum and the robots might make a mess in the interwikis. -- [Anon]
- Then what's needed is an article about Budapest and an article about Aquincum/Óbuda. Till we have both, the interwiki change is not helpful, so I have reverted it. For the present, this is our article about Budapest. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:04, 11 Augusti 2007 (UTC)
- Aquincum corresponds to Óbuda not Budapest.
New pages
[fontem recensere]Can someone please create the pages for the other two sites in the list? Kapeter77 (disputatio) 12:32, 28 Novembris 2019 (UTC)