Disputatio:Christophorus Paolini
Appearance
Shouldn't his name be Khristoferus Paolini or something? --BiT 18:56, 8 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
- Christophorus?--Ioshus (disp) 19:02, 8 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
- And having been born in 1983, is he still "juvenis"? IacobusAmor 19:45, 8 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
- Good points. --BiT 19:51, 8 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
- He's not senex yet — I think he's going to be iuvenis [1] for awhile longer. —Mucius Tever 00:32, 9 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
- He isn't really juvenis, just a vir? --BiT 01:47, 9 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
- I still don't understand. Being born in 1983 would make him a young man even in English. Certainly he's not a puer, if that's what you're thinking of. —Mucius Tever 12:54, 10 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
- He isn't really juvenis, just a vir? --BiT 01:47, 9 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
- He's not senex yet — I think he's going to be iuvenis [1] for awhile longer. —Mucius Tever 00:32, 9 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
- Good points. --BiT 19:51, 8 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
- And having been born in 1983, is he still "juvenis"? IacobusAmor 19:45, 8 Februarii 2007 (UTC)