Disputatio:Olympia hiemalia 1980
Ordo Verborum
[fontem recensere]Why Placidus Lacus and not Lacus Placidus? LionhardusCiampa 22:35, 27 Septembris 2007 (UTC)
- Nescio! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 23:35, 27 Septembris 2007 (UTC)
- Forsitan is, qui Placidus Lacus scripsit, exemplo usus sit Novo Eboraco, cui idem vocum ordo est. Autumo igitur de analogia agi, falsa quidem. --Neander 00:46, 28 Septembris 2007 (UTC)
- Novum Eboracum is a bad example. Novus is one of those adjectives (parvus, vetus, and a couple of others) that traditionally come before the noun, but they are the EXCEPTION. My vote is for Lacus Placidus. LionhardusCiampa 02:03, 28 Septembris 2007 (UTC)
- Mine too (as I hinted to). --Neander 02:09, 28 Septembris 2007 (UTC)
- Novum Eboracum is a bad example. Novus is one of those adjectives (parvus, vetus, and a couple of others) that traditionally come before the noun, but they are the EXCEPTION. My vote is for Lacus Placidus. LionhardusCiampa 02:03, 28 Septembris 2007 (UTC)
- Forsitan is, qui Placidus Lacus scripsit, exemplo usus sit Novo Eboraco, cui idem vocum ordo est. Autumo igitur de analogia agi, falsa quidem. --Neander 00:46, 28 Septembris 2007 (UTC)