Disputatio:Secundum bellum Punicum

Should we keep this name? as far as I remember, the Romans referred to it as Bellum Hannibalicum. Or maybe Alterum (rather than secundum) Bellum Punicum? --Xaverius 18:34, 16 Martii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(...) quinto anno secundi Punici belli(...) from Liber XXIV by T. Livius in Ab urbe condita, which is a good reference as history of Rome =) Hope it helps! sorry for bad English --HerbaDulcis 19:26, 16 Martii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Optime! now I can tell my teachers, who keep telling me how more appropriate "bellum Hannibalicum" is....--Xaverius 18:04, 17 Martii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

plus : it should be Secundum Bellum Punici because in this syntagm, the nominal attribute to bellum is Punicus, a, um or, if you like Punicus 3